Inaccurate, Misleading or Harmful coverage
When the press gets something wrong, the impact can be serious — affecting your reputation, relationships, work, and wellbeing.
Harm does not only arise from clear factual mistakes. It can also come from misleading images, or the implications of how a story is presented.
The Press Justice Project supports people affected by inaccurate, misleading, and harmful media coverage. We provide clear, confidential guidance to help you understand your rights and decide what steps to take.
When coverage may be inaccurate AND harmful
You may have grounds to challenge press coverage if it:
Contains factual inaccuracies
Creates a false or misleading impression
Presents speculation or opinion as fact
Implies blame or responsibility where it does not belong
Publishes or reuses images in ways that distort the truth
Edits interviews in a way that misrepresents your views
Even where individual statements are correct, the way they are presented can significantly change their meaning.
Misleading interviews
Interviews can sometimes be edited in ways that distort what you have said.
Misrepresentation in interviews can include:
Key context being removed, changing the meaning of your comments
Selective editing that portrays your views inaccurately
Headlines or summaries that contradict your message
Even a single interview can cause harm if it significantly damages your reputation.
Misuse of images
Images are powerful and can strongly shape public perception.
Misuse of images can include:
Publishing photographs without proper consent in certain situations
Pairing images with misleading headlines or captions
Presenting photographs in a way that distorts your role in events
The way an image is selected, cropped, or positioned can change how it is understood.
Your right to challenge coverage
If coverage about you is inaccurate or misleading, you may be able to obtain:
A correction or clarification
An amendment to wording or presentation
Removal or replacement of misleading images
A more visible or properly worded correction
A formal review of your complaint
In certain cases, inaccurate coverage which causes you serious harm could be grounds for legal action. Newspapers are also legally required to process your data accurately.
How we support you
The Press Justice Project offers independent, confidential support. We can:
Help identify inaccuracies, misleading edits, or harmful framing
Assess whether reporting may provide grounds for a regulatory complaint
Explain your rights under relevant press codes
Draft or review correspondence and complaints
Signpost further options
Offer a referral for qualified legal advice, in certain situations
In the UK, most newspapers are members of a press-controlled complaints system. This system does not, in our view, provide sufficient protection to the public from press harms. But we are nonetheless expert in its operation, and on hand to advise prospective complainants on how it operates and the best routes of achieving redress.
Our role is to help you feel informed, supported, and in control — not pressured into action.
If you are considering taking action
If press coverage about you feels inaccurate or misleading you do not have to face it alone.
The Press Justice Project can help you understand your options and decide what to do next.
Further Reading
How Newspapers get away with unethical reporting of small boat arrivals
The press operates with a ‘bias of caricatures’
Dr Aiden Kelly on misrepresentation in the press
The Times misreports on HS2 Poll

